Environmental sustainability is a key focus for the ARCHER2 service—both in terms of day-to-day operation and research and development activities—to understand how the environmental sustainability of ARCHER2 can continue to be improved over its lifetime and to develop improvements for future services. This includes work on understanding and communicating emissions from ARCHER2 within the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol framework to support improving the carbon efficiency of the service and awareness among users; and working to ensure that biodiversity is promoted at the ACF data centre where ARCHER2 is housed.

Emissions

We are committed to reducing our carbon footprint within the ARCHER2 service and contributing to the University of Edinburgh’s commitment to being zero carbon by 2040.

In this section we provide more information on the estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the ARCHER2 service.

Impact on reducing emissions

As well as a producer of GHG emissions, HPC systems like ARCHER2 also contribute to reducing emissions. The main source of reduced emissions from services such as ARCHER2 is in the research that leads to new technology, policies and approaches to reducing emissions. Some examples include:

The emissions reductions from such activities are extremely difficult to quantify for a number of reasons so, at the moment, these are not factored in to the emissions estimates for ARCHER2.

As well as the research activities on the service leading to reductions in emissions, there are other activities that HPC services can potentially take. For example:

Estimating emissions from ARCHER2

Scope 3 emissions

Scope 3 emissions from the ARCHER2 hardware have been estimated from a subset of the components that are expected to make up the majority of the emissions. Note that there is a large amount of uncertainty for Scope 3 emissions due to lack of high quality Scope 3 emissions data from vendors. In particular, the number used for the compute node emissions is at the high end of estimated values and the actual value could be as much as 15% lower at around 900 kgCO2e/node.

Component Count Estimated kgCO2e per unit Estimated kgCO2e % Total Scope 3 References
Compute nodes 5,860 nodes 1,100 6,400,000 84% (1)
Interconnect switches 768 switches 280 150,000 2% (2)
Lustre HDD 19,759,200 GB 0.02 400,000 6% (3)
Lustre SSD 1,900,800 GB 0.16 300,000 4% (3)
NFS HDD 3,240,000 GB 0.02 70,000 1% (3)
Total     7,320,000 100%  

We then estimate the per-CU (nodeh) Scope 3 emissions by assuming a service lifetime of 6 years and 100% availability:

7,320,000 kgCO2e / (5,860 nodes * 6 years * 365 days * 24 hours) = 0.023 kgCO2e/CU

All the tools described below use a value of 0.023 kgCO2e/CU for Scope 3 emissions from ARCHER2.

References:

  1. IRISCAST Final Report
  2. Estimate taken from IBM z16™ multi frame 24-port Ethernet Switch Product Carbon Footprint
  3. Tannu and Nair, 2023

Scope 2 emissions

Scope 2 emissions from ARCHER2 are zero as the service is supplied by 100% certified renewable energy. For information purposes we can calculate what the Scope 2 emissions would have been if the energy was not 100% renewable energy using the methodology described below.

We are aware that there is ongoing discussion in the sustainability community about the impact and effectiveness of certified renewable energy contracts that are supplied through UK National Grid connections. We are monitoring these discussions and taking advice from sustainability professionals on how we report and estimate ARCHER2 emissions.

UK National Grid based Scope 2 emissions are calculated using the compute node energy use for particular jobs along with the carbon intensity of the South Scotland region of the UK National Grid at the start time of the job. The carbon intensity is retrieved from the carbonintensity.org.uk web API.

If the energy use of a job is not available (which happens occasionally due to, e.g. counter failures) then the mean per node power draw from 1 Jan 2024 - 30 Jun 2024 on ARCHER2 is used to compute the energy consumption. This corresponds to a value of 0.41 kW per node.

Estimates of power draw of individual components of ARCHER2 suggest that the compute node power draw makes up around 85% of the system power draw so we also add 15% of the measured energy to the value to estimate the contribution from other components.

Component Count Loaded power draw per unit (kW) Loaded power draw (kW) % Total Notes
Compute nodes 5,860 nodes 0.41 2,400 85% Measured by on system counters
Interconnect switches 768 switches 0.24 240 9% Measured by on system counters
Lustre storage 5 file systems 8 40 1% Estimate from vendor
NFS storage 4 file systems 8 32 1% Estimate from vendor
Coolant distribution units 6 CDU 16 96 3% Estimate from vendor
Total     2,808 99%  

Overheads from the electrical and cooling plant will vary with outside weather conditions at the data centre but are typically less than 10%. As a conservative estimate in the tools we develop we add 10% of the total energy to get the estimated energy use including plant overheads.

The final process for calculation the energy use of a job is

  1. Retrieve the measured job energy from Slurm (or compute energy based on a node power draw of 0.41 kW if the value is not available from Slurm).
  2. Add 15% of this value to estimate energy use by other components.
  3. Add 10% of the new value to estimate overheads from the plant.

Tools available to users

Please see the ARCHER2 documentation: Estimating your emissions for information on the tools available on ARCHER2 to estimate emissions from use of the service.

Biodiversity

The UK is ranked as the lowest G7 nation for biodiversity intactness and has seen a 19% decline in species abundance since 1970. The University of Edinburgh is a signatory of the Nature Positive Universities Alliance and EPCC is committed to understanding the impact our service activities have on biodiversity. We are investigating the impact on biodiversity from the production of ARCHER2 and looking at ways to reduce the impact during decommissioning through effective waste management. As mentioned in the emissions section above, a key aim is also to protect and enhance biodiversity on the ACF site. Firstly, we have worked to protect the existing biodiversity on site, with the machine room built around a traditional central tree roundel and an area of wetland left untouched for wildlife. We have also worked to enhance conditions for biodiversity to thrive, planting diverse native hedgerows, creating wildlife meadows for pollinators and creating wildlife corridors through fencing. Felled wood has been used to provide habitats for insects on site.